DAAL-WS: A weakly-supervised method integrated with data augmentation and active learning strategies for MLS point cloud semantic segmentation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
• An EC-Mix3D data augmentation strategy is designed to augment the training data. • A PLEP active learning strategy is presented to effectively reduce label redundancy. • The proposed DAAL-WS model achieves competitive accuracy using only sparse labels. Mobile laser scanning (MLS) point clouds have increasingly been a significant data source for acquiring accurate three-dimensional (3D) semantic information from complex scenes. However, most current point cloud semantic segmentation methods heavily depend on a huge number of manually labeled training samples, which is labor-intensive and time-consuming. To address the above challenge, a weakly-supervised MLS point cloud semantic segmentation method integrated with data augmentation and active learning strategies is proposed (termed DAAL-WS). By taking advantage of our previously presented multi-branch weakly-supervised network (WSPointNet) in weakly supervisory signals and ensemble predictions, the DAAL-WS integrates WSPointNet with two essential components, i.e., an elevation-calibrated Mix3D (EC-Mix3D) data augmentation strategy and a point-level ensemble prediction-based (PLEP) active learning strategy. Specifically, the EC-Mix3D data augmentation strategy leverages elevation information to calibrate sub-point clouds and generates new contextual scenes by mixing the elevation-calibrated sub-point clouds, thereby augmenting the training point cloud distribution. Designed to reduce labeling redundancy, the PLEP active learning strategy selects the most important labeled points for model training. This strategy first measures the uncertainty for each unlabeled point by ensemble predictions and then employs a feature-distance suppression module to select the significant and discriminating unlabeled points for manual labeling. The proposed DAAL-WS method was evaluated on three public MLS datasets, including Toronto3D, Paris-Lille-3D, and WHU-MLS datasets, on which DAAL-WS obtained a competitive performance over fully-supervised baselines using only 0.015 %, 0.03 %, and 0.03 % labeled points, with mean Intersection over Union (mIoU) scores of 81.91 %, 82.59 %, and 60.36 %, respectively.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".