MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4399604927 · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-4549934/v1

A simple phylogenetic approach to analyze hypermutated HIV proviruses reveals insights into their dynamics and persistence during antiretroviral therapy

2024· preprint· en· W4399604927 on OpenAlexaff
Aniqa Shahid, Bradley R. Jones, Maggie C. Duncan, Signe MacLennan, Michael J. Dapp, Mark H. Kuniholm, Bradley E. Aouizerat, Nancie M. Archin, Stephen J. Gange, Igho Ofotokun, Margaret A. Fischl, Seble Kassaye, Harris Goldstein, Kathryn Anastos, Jeffrey B. Joy, Zabrina L. Brumme

Bibliographic record

VenueResearch Square · 2024
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicHIV Research and Treatment
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhylogenetic treeBiologyViral quasispeciesGenomeGeneticsViral evolutionSomatic hypermutationEvolutionary biologyGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Hypermutated proviruses, which arise in a single HIV replication cycle when host antiviral APOBEC3 proteins introduce extensive G-to-A mutations throughout the viral genome, persist in all people living with HIV receiving antiretroviral therapy (ART). But, the within-host evolutionary origins of hypermutated sequences are incompletely understood because phylogenetic inference algorithms, which assume that mutations gradually accumulate over generations, incorrectly reconstruct their ancestor-descendant relationships. Using >1400 longitudinal single-genome-amplified HIV env-gp120 sequences isolated from six women over a median 18 years of follow-up − including plasma HIV RNA sequences collected over a median 9 years between seroconversion and ART initiation, and >500 proviruses isolated over a median 9 years on ART − we evaluated three approaches for removing hypermutation from nucleotide alignments. Our goals were to 1) reconstruct accurate phylogenies that can be used for molecular dating and 2) phylogenetically infer the integration dates of hypermutated proviruses persisting during ART. Two of the tested approaches (stripping all positions containing putative APOBEC3 mutations from the alignment, or replacing individual putative APOBEC3 mutations in hypermutated sequences with the ambiguous base R) consistently normalized tree topologies, eliminated erroneous clustering of hypermutated proviruses, and brought env-intact and hypermutated proviruses into comparable ranges with respect to multiple tree-based metrics. Importantly, these corrected trees produced integration date estimates for env-intact proviruses that were highly concordant with those from benchmark trees that excluded hypermutated sequences, indicating that the corrected trees can be used for molecular dating. Use of these trees to infer the integration dates of hypermutated proviruses persisting during ART revealed that these spanned a wide age range, with the oldest ones dating to shortly after infection. This indicates that hypermutated proviruses, like other provirus types, begin to be seeded into the proviral pool immediately following infection, and can persist for decades. In two of the six participants, hypermutated proviruses differed from env-intact ones in terms of their age distributions, suggesting that different provirus types decay at heterogeneous rates in some hosts. These simple approaches to reconstruct hypermutated provirus' evolutionary histories, allow insights into their in vivo origins and longevity, towards a more comprehensive understanding of HIV persistence during ART.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.328
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResearch Square→Same topicHIV Research and Treatment→French-language works237,207→