MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399606040 · doi:10.1093/forestry/cpae030

Prioritizing commercial thinning: quantification of growth and competition with high-density drone laser scanning

2024· article· en· W4399606040 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Liam Irwin, Nicholas C. Coops, José Riofrío, Samuel Grubinger, Ignacio Barbeito, Alexis Achim, Dominik Röeser

Bibliographic record

VenueForestry An International Journal of Forest Research · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicRemote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversité LavalNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsLaser scanningBasal areaPoint cloudCrown (dentistry)Competition (biology)Environmental scienceLidarTerrainMultivariate statisticsUnivariateRemote sensingMathematicsStatisticsGeographyEcologyForestryComputer scienceBiologyLaserOpticsPhysicsArtificial intelligenceMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Laser scanning sensors mounted on drones enable on-demand quantification of forest structure through the collection of high-density point clouds (500+ points m−2). These point clouds facilitate the detection of individual trees enabling the quantification of growth-related variables within a stand that can inform precision management. We present a methodology to link incremental growth data obtained from tree cores with crown models derived from drone laser scanning, quantifying the relative growth condition of individual trees and their neighbours. We stem-mapped 815 trees across five stands in north-central British Columbia, Canada of which 16% were cored to quantify recent basal area growth. Point clouds from drone laser scanning and orthomosaic imagery were used to locate trees, model three-dimensional crown features, and derive competition metrics describing the relative distribution of crown sizes. Local access to water and light were simulated using topographic wetness and potential solar irradiance indices derived from high-resolution terrain and surface models. Wall-to-wall predictions of recent basal area growth were produced from the best-performing model and summarized across a grid alongside a tree-level competition index. Overall, crown volume was most strongly correlated with observed differences in 5-year basal area increment (R2 = 0.70, P < .001). Competition and solar irradiance metrics were significant as univariate predictors (P < .001) but nonsignificant when included in multivariate models with crown volume. Using predictions from the best-performing model and laser-scanning-derived competition metrics, we present a newly developed growth competition index to assess variability and inform commercial thinning prescription prioritization. Growth predictions, competition metrics, and the growth competition index are summarized into maps that could be used in an operational workflow. Our methodology presents a new capacity to capture and quantify intra-stand variation in growth by combining competition metrics and measures of recent growth with high-density drone laser scanning data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.214
Threshold uncertainty score0.262

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.339
Teacher spread0.303 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2024
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueForestry An International Journal of Forest ResearchSame topicRemote Sensing and LiDAR ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207