MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399606302 · doi:10.1080/29933021.2024.2358240

Sexual and gender minoritized youth on the impact of a community-based program

2024· article· en· W4399606302 on OpenAlexaffabout
Kaitlin Fredericks, Carla Cesaroni

Bibliographic record

VenueSexual and Gender Diversity in Social Services · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicLGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
Canadian institutionsOntario Tech UniversityBrock University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychologyGender studiesPolitical scienceSociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study uses qualitative interviews to explore the perceptions of sexual and gender minoritized youth on the impact of a sexual and gender minoritized–specific community-based youth program in Ontario, Canada: The Open Doors drop-in program. Thematic analysis revealed that Open Doors created feelings of safety, social connectedness, and empowerment, and also provided youth with tools and resources for building capacity and exercising resilience. Youth felt that they were afforded experiences in Open Doors that they did not have elsewhere. The findings of this research have important implications for centering youth voices and experiences in sexual and gender minoritized–specific community-based programs in both practice and research.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.401
Threshold uncertainty score0.927

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.195
GPT teacher head0.420
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSexual and Gender Diversity in Social ServicesSame topicLGBTQ Health, Identity, and PolicyFrench-language works237,207