Disruption in functional networks mediated tau spreading in Alzheimer’s disease
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Alzheimer's disease may be conceptualized as a 'disconnection syndrome', characterized by the breakdown of neural connectivity within the brain as a result of amyloid-beta plaques, tau neurofibrillary tangles and other factors leading to progressive degeneration and shrinkage of neurons, along with synaptic dysfunction. It has been suggested that misfolded tau proteins spread through functional connections (known as 'prion-like' properties of tau). However, the local effect of tau spreading on the synaptic function and communication between regions is not well understood. I aimed to investigate how the spreading of tau aggregates through connections can locally influence functional connectivity. In total, the imaging data of 211 participants including 117 amyloid-beta-negative non-demented and 94 amyloid-beta-positive non-demented participants were recruited from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. Furthermore, normative resting-state functional MRI connectomes were used to model tau spreading through functional connections, and functional MRI of the included participants was used to determine the effect of tau spreading on functional connectivity. I found that lower functional connectivity to tau epicentres is associated with tau spreading through functional connections in both amyloid-beta-negative and amyloid-beta-positive participants. Also, amyloid-beta-PET in tau epicentres mediated the association of tau spreading and functional connectivity to epicentres suggesting a partial mediating effect of amyloid-beta deposition in tau epicentres on the local effect of tau spreading on functional connectivity. My findings provide strong support for the notion that tau spreading through connection is locally associated with disrupted functional connectivity between tau epicentre and non-epicentre regions independent of amyloid-beta pathology. Also, I defined several groups based on the relationship between tau spreading and functional disconnection, which provides quantitative assessment to investigate susceptibility or resilience to functional disconnection related to tau spreading. I showed that amyloid-beta, other copathologies and the apolipoprotein E epsilon 4 allele can be a leading factor towards vulnerability to tau relative functional disconnection.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".