MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399618191 · doi:10.4000/11tfu

Nicolas Rouvière, Goscinny et le Facteur Rhésus . Un art de l’anti-portrait

2024· article· fr· W4399618191 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.

Bibliographic record

VenueBelphégor · 2024
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldPsychology
TopicDiverse Academia and Research Topics
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPortraitArtHumanitiesArt history

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nicolas Rouvière s’est désormais imposé comme le meilleur spécialiste de l’œuvre de ce petit (physiquement) géant de la bande dessinée qu’a été René Goscinny, grâce aux ouvrages fouillés et considérables qu’il a consacrés à l’analyse de la saga d’Astérix. Avec ce petit volume agile, de lecture facile et agréable, il démontre que la profondeur peut aussi très bien se concilier avec la rapidité.Le Facteur Rhésus, publié en 1964 dans L’Os à moelle, le journal satirique de Pierre Dac, provisoire...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.388
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.017

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.365
Teacher spread0.320 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it