An Efficient Resource Allocation Scheme With Uncertain Network Status in Edge Computing-Enabled Networks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Collaborative resource allocation is crucial for reducing overhead and enhancing resource utilization in edge computing-enabled networks. To ensure a satisfactory user experience, we recognize the importance of considering information uncertainty in resource allocation. Therefore, we explore information uncertainty in edge computing-enabled networks, especially within the complex environment of resource coupling. However, existing methods lack a comprehensive and robust solution for coordinating wireless, transport, and computing resource under this information uncertainty. This paper addresses this gap by proposing a joint optimization of access point (AP) selection, computing node association, and traffic engineering, aiming to maximize network utility under the uncertain conditions of wireless status and application QoS requirements. The constraints under these uncertainties are modeled as chance constraints, complicating the problem's solvability. We adopt the Bernstein approximation to establish convex conservative approximations of the chance constraints. Given the problem's substantial size and computational complexity, the alternating direction method of multipliers is employed to solve the approximated problem in a distributed manner. We further derive the closed solutions of the corresponding sub-problems. Extensive simulations validate the superiority of our proposed scheme, demonstrating its ability to achieve a good trade-off between meeting user requirements and optimizing resource utilization.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".