Tailoring soy protein/corn zein mixture by limited enzymatic hydrolysis to improve digestibility and functionality
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study aimed to modify plant protein mixture to improve their functionality and digestibility by limited hydrolysis. Soy protein isolate and corn zein were mixed at the ratio of 5:1 (w/w), followed by limited hydrolysis using papain from 15 to 30 min. The structural characteristics, in vitro digestibility, and functional properties were evaluated. Also, DPPH radical scavenging activity was determined. The results indicated that the molecular weight of different modified samples was largely reduced by limited hydrolysis, and the proportion of random coil was significantly increased. Furthermore, the solubility, foaming, emulsifying and water-holding capacity of hydrolyzed protein mixture were significantly improved, which were close to those of whey protein isolate. In vitro digestibility after 30-min limited hydrolysis was remarkably elevated. In addition, the hydrolyzed protein mixture exhibited a higher antioxidant activity than those of untreated proteins. Overall, limited hydrolysis of protein mixture led to improved digestibility, functionality and antioxidant activity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".