The application of improved backpropagation neural network in college student achievement prediction
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Educational institutions generate a large amount of digital data in their daily operations, which is stored in servers, forming a substantial educational data set. Extracting valuable information through practical data analysis has become a critical problem that needs to be solved urgently. Students' examination results are an essential basis for evaluating their learning status, which reflects the effect of school education to some extent. Therefore, we propose a model based on the BP network and Pandas to construct a prediction model for Pandas' performance in the first year and their successful graduation to explore the potential relationship between Pandas' performance in the freshman year and graduation, thus realizing the principle of early guidance and improvement of teaching quality. Through the random prediction experiment of 9,424 scores data of 304 students in 2017 and 2018 majoring in network engineering at a university, the accuracy rate is 96.71% after the experimental data analysis and verification, which has proved that there is a potential correlation between the students' first-year course scores and graduation. Meanwhile, the improved BP network proposed in the present research exhibits reasonable practicability and extensibility in the college student achievement prediction model.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it