Exploring attitude and intention toward solar panel cleaning robots: Evidence from user insights
Bibliographic record
Abstract
There is a global trend towards adopting green energy, with solar energy being the primary source derived from solar panel technologies. Solar panels can generate enough power for general and household use. However, to effectively function and serve their purpose, they require regular cleaning and effective maintenance, and robotic cleaning is among the current applicable technologies. This research aims to determine the intention of using solar panel cleaning robots in Thailand for individual solar panel users. The study was hinged on the extended C-TAM-TPB model. The quantitative survey study design was employed using primary data collected from individual solar panel users in their households. 419 respondents were used to collect the data. The C-TAM-TPB model proposed using reliability, validity, and model fitness which employed confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). They adopted structural equation modeling (SEM) in the evaluation of the variables' relationships and study hypotheses. Subjective norms and trust in technology, individual control perception, and awareness of renewable energy significantly and positively affected behavioral intention to use solar panel cleaning robots as indicated by the study. Trust in technology, awareness of renewable energy, and environmental concerns were found to be pivotal mediators to the attitude effect on individual users' intention to act in using solar panel cleaning robots. The authors recommend that to improve the adoption of solar panel cleaning robots; the concerned stakeholders should consider, firstly, enhancing trust in the technology of these robots, which is crucial, focusing on aspects like reliability, privacy, security, and reputation. Secondly, considering the influence of subjective norms, including perceptions from family, friends, colleagues, and experts, is essential. Perceived behavioral control should also be a focal point, encompassing self-efficacy, resources, and complexity. Moreover, increasing awareness of renewable energy and environmental benefits is vital to encourage individual adoption. The research also recommended that to encourage the adoption and use of solar panel cleaning robots, the aspects that should be emphasized include subjective norm, perceived behavior control, trust in technology, and awareness of renewable energy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".