MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399649110 · doi:10.69723/njms.02.03.0346

BRAIN DRAIN: INTENTIONS OF HOUSE OFFICERS IN SPECIALIZING FROM PAKISTAN OR ABROAD AND ITS’ VARIOUS INFLUENCING FACTORS AMONGST MEDICAL GRADUATES FROM PESHAWAR, PAKISTAN

2023· article· en· W4399649110 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Daniyal Ahmed, Haroon Tariq, Faiqa Qazi, Hamza Hadi, Farishta Hamayun, Hadiqa Shafi

Bibliographic record

VenueNorthwest journal of medical sciences. · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicGlobal Health Workforce Issues
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBrain drainMedical educationPsychologyMedicineBusinessEconomic growthEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION: Brain drain is defined as the immigration of highly qualified health professionals from low- income countries to high-income affluent countries in pursuit of a better & safer quality of life. A cross-sectional study was conducted to determine the magnitude of migratory intentions of House Officers of four main tertiary care hospitals based in Peshawar, Pakistan. METHODOLOGY: The research design for this study was a cross sectional study which was carried out in four tertiary care hospitals of Peshawar KPK. The duration of this study was 5 months from March - July 2022. Data was collected through convenient sampling and 195 participants were involved in filling a self-structured questionnaire. RESULTS: The results of this study revealed that out of 195 respondents 104(53.3%) intended to go abroad for specialization while 91(46.67%) opted to stay in Pakistan.The study also showed that out of 195 medical graduates 104(53.3%) opted for abroad in which 32(31.37%) preferred to go United States, 62(60.78%) preferred United Kingdom and 8(7.84%) preferred other countries (Australia and Canada) for post graduate training. 48.6% males and 59.3% females have intentions for going abroad with a p value of 0.138 which is not significant; implying that the there is no difference between males & females in selecting their career choice. CONCLUSION: The findings of our research highlight the reasons behind the immigration of medical graduates. When large number of graduates are going abroad there would be its implications on healthcare and academic policies. This study can help government to make appropriate policies to address brain drain. On basis of data collected if there is economic stability, better training facilities and attractive salary packages are being provided by state of Pakistan then there will a decrease in the number of house officers migrating abroad. KEYWORDS: House officers, Specialization, Brain drain, Residency

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.083
GPT teacher head0.455
Teacher spread0.372 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNorthwest journal of medical sciences.Same topicGlobal Health Workforce IssuesFrench-language works237,207