MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Simulation of fuel cell membrane durability under vehicle operation

2024· article· en· W4399654840 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Mohammad Shojayian, Mohsen Mazrouei Sebdani, Erik Kjeang

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Power Sources · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFuel Cells and Related Materials
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
FundersSFU Community Trust Endowment FundNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsDurabilityFuel cellsProton exchange membrane fuel cellMembraneMaterials scienceAutomotive engineeringEngineeringWaste managementEnvironmental scienceChemistryChemical engineeringComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this work, a statistical fuel cell chemo-mechanical membrane degradation model is developed based on the ionomer fibrillar morphology as a framework for use-level membrane durability prediction for fuel cell electric vehicles . The mechanical and chemical degradation modes are separately calibrated with pressure differential-accelerated mechanical stress tests and accelerated membrane durability tests, respectively. Finite element simulations are used to estimate the initial stress distribution across the membrane, while the genetic algorithm with the least squares method is employed to calibrate the model parameters with experimental results, thus reaching a good agreement. Next, the validated model is utilized for a case study of fuel cell electric transit bus operation in the city of Victoria, B.C., Canada. The initial cell voltage profile is obtained using a dynamic fuel cell power system model applied to the transit bus drive cycle recorded during real-world operation. According to the model predictions, reducing the stack nominal power from 396 to 132 kW results in a 148% membrane lifetime enhancement, whereas decreasing the cell temperature from 90 to 70°C results in an 11-fold increase in the membrane lifetime under simulated transit bus operation, thereby exceeding the 25,000-h lifetime target for this application.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.186
Threshold uncertainty score0.347

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2024
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Power SourcesSame topicFuel Cells and Related MaterialsFrench-language works237,207