MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399659921 · doi:10.1016/j.xkme.2024.100858

Glucocorticoid Minimization in Anti-Neutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody-Associated Vasculitis: An International Survey of Clinicians

2024· article· en· W4399659921 on OpenAlex
David Massicotte‐Azarniouch, Mark Canney, Priscilla Karnabi, Peter A. Merkel, Rachel Jones, Ruth J. Pepper, Alan D. Salama, Vimal K. Derebail, Nataliya Milman, Mats Junek, Christian Pagnoux, David Jayne, Michael Walsh

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueKidney Medicine · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicVasculitis and related conditions
Canadian institutionsMount Sinai HospitalMcMaster UniversityUniversity Health NetworkOttawa HospitalUniversity of Ottawa
FundersVasculitis Foundation
KeywordsGlucocorticoidVasculitisImmunologyAntibodyMedicineCytoplasmInternal medicineChemistryBiochemistryDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Rationale & Objective: Research in anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis (AAV) has focused on reducing treatment toxicities, notably through reduction of exposure to glucocorticoids. Glucocorticoid-sparing therapies such as avacopan are not widely available in many countries, and patients are exposed to high glucocorticoid doses. There is little data concerning what clinicians should accept as the lowest glucocorticoid dosing that can be used in induction therapy for AAV. Study Design: International, online survey. Setting & Participants: Clinicians in various countries with experience in managing vasculitis. Exposure and Outcomes: Survey questions to gauge interest and preferences in studying an induction of remission regimen for severe AAV using only 2 or 4 weeks of glucocorticoids without avacopan. Data collected included general opinions about standard of care for induction agents, glucocorticoids, and avacopan. Respondents were presented with 3 candidate trial designs, 2 of which proposed a combination of cyclophosphamide and rituximab induction. Analytical Approach: Using a 10-point Likert scale, respondents ranked each candidate trial on its usefulness in demonstrating whether a minimal glucocorticoid regimen would be safe and effective and their willingness to randomize into the trial. Results: There were 210 respondents to the survey. The candidate trials were rated moderate-to-high for usefulness to demonstrate safety and efficacy (scores 6-7/10), and moderate (scores 5-6/10) for willingness to randomize. Four-week glucocorticoid duration was preferred to 2 weeks, and combination cyclophosphamide-rituximab with 4-week glucocorticoids was the most preferred design. Forty-two percent of respondents felt avacopan had to be incorporated into a minimal GC trial design to want to recruit patients. Limitations: Representativeness of survey sample and generalizability of findings. Conclusions: Combination cyclophosphamide-rituximab may be the ideal way of studying minimal glucocorticoid use in severe AAV. Given its increasing uptake, incorporating avacopan into a potential trial design is important.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.028
Threshold uncertainty score0.933

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.343
Teacher spread0.316 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it