MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4399660507 · doi:10.32920/26042749

The Politics of Indigenous Representation In American and Canadian Physique Photography of the 1950s and 1960s

2024· preprint· en· W4399660507 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Gillian Wall

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIndigenousRepresentation (politics)Human sexualityPoliticsPhotographyPhotojournalismGender studiesDiversity (politics)Self representationSexualizationHistorySociologyAnthropologyVisual artsArtHumanitiesPolitical scienceLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This thesis examines the racial, social and gender politics present in the Indigenous representation of the golden era of Physique photography during the 1950s and 1960s. It explores themes such as: the romanticization and sexualization of Indigenous men, links between Indigenous imagery and homoerotic imagery in Physique photography, what it means to "play Indian," and, the semiotic relationship between cowboys and "Indians." This collection of photographs originates primarily from Western Physique magazines of the 1950s and 1960s and is taken from the Thomas Waugh Collection, which is housed within the Sexual Representations Collection at the Mark S. Bonham Centre for Sexual Diversity Studies, TheArQuives - Canada's LGBTQ2+Archives and The Gale Database Archives of Sexuality and Gender.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.090
Threshold uncertainty score0.650

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0050.006
Science and technology studies0.0280.014
Scholarly communication0.0080.002
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCanadian Identity and History→French-language works237,207→