MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399663129 · doi:10.1117/12.3018901

Progress of the Warm Calibration Unit (WCU) subsystem of METIS towards the full subsystem integration: an overview of the post-FDR status

2024· article· en· W4399663129 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Yigit Dallilar, Vipin Kumar, Michael Wiest, Lucas Labadie, R. van Boekel, Emilie Bouzerand, Bernhard R. Brandl, W. Brandner, Dennis Dolkens, Adrian M. Glauser, Sander Kwast, R. Le Poole, Dirk Lesman, Mirka Maresca, Gert Raskin, C. Straubmeier, Remko Stuik, Niels Tromp, Felix Bettonvil

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicCalibration and Measurement Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMetisCalibrationComputer scienceUnit (ring theory)MathematicsMathematics educationStatisticsDatabase

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

METIS is one of the first-generation instruments currently in development for the Extremely Large Telescope (ELT). As one of the partners in the project consortium, the team at University of Cologne is responsible for the development of the Warm Calibration Unit (WCU) subsystem. This subsystem is designed to deliver a selection of broadband and single wavelength sources for the calibration of the METIS instrument along with pupil/focal plane imaging optics serving as feedback for the internal alignment of the subsystems of METIS during the integration phase foreseen in Leiden. After the satisfactory Final Design Review (FDR) towards the end of 2022, the development of the WCU subsystem is currently in the manufacturing/procurement phase along with the integration of sub-assemblies. We provide an overview of the development of the WCU subsystem at this phase of the project including the progress on the manufacturing of custom components and the details on the compliance with the design principles with a primary focus on the mechanical aspects. These components include as an example: (1) a lightweight optical bench made of carbon-fiber reinforced polymer (CFRP) and with dimensions of roughly 2.5mx3m and a thickness of 20cm, satisfying compliancy both with high loads and tight tolerances (on the level of several tens of microns), (2) custom-designed six adjustable supporting links responsible for carrying the subsystem (roughly 1 tons) and its alignment to METIS focal/pupil planes within desired accuracies 50 microns with the help of laser sensors, (3) kinematic optical Aluminum mounts with a thermal invariant design (i.e. positioning of the optics are not affected by temperature). In the light of the progress, we discuss further the perspectives and the planning towards the full integration and testing of the full subsystem, foreseen to start within the second quarter of 2025.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.012
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.063

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0120.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.078
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCalibration and Measurement TechniquesFrench-language works237,207