MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399663168 · doi:10.1117/12.3019466

AIT support equipment design for METIS

2024· article· en· W4399663168 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Yu Chieh Huang, R. Stuik, Dirk Lesman, Shiang‐Yu Wang, Ping-Jie Huang, Jia Ruei Nian, Hsin-Yo Chen, Tashun Wei, Shu Fu Hsu, G. P. P. L. Otten, Felix Bettonvil, Bernhard R. Brandl

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSpacecraft Design and Technology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMetisComputer scienceWorld Wide Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Mid-Infrared ELT Imager and Spectrometer (METIS) is a first light instrument for the Extremely Large Telescope (ELT) in Chile, covering the 3-19 micrometer wavelength range in the mid-infrared. As the project entered system Assembly, Integration, and Testing (AIT) phase at Leiden University in early 2026, dedicated Support Equipment (SEQ) is essential for safe handling, accurate alignment, and efficient verification of the instrument and its subsystems. This paper presents the design and realization of the SEQ units developed by the Academia Sinica Institute of Astronomy and Astrophysics (ASIAA). These units include the AIT Support Frame (ASF), the ASF/METIS transport container, the cleanroom booth, the cryostat AIT Lifting Platform (ALP) and subsystem ALP. The SEQ design requirements, engineering simulations, structural analyses, and final implementation are presented. The completed units delivered to the METIS AIT facility demonstrate the readiness of METIS for the integration and verification phase.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.030
Threshold uncertainty score0.099

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0300.015

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSpacecraft Design and TechnologyFrench-language works237,207