MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399663481 · doi:10.1117/12.3019216

Final design and opto-mechanical analysis of the GIRMOS calibration system and field lens assembly

2024· article· en· W4399663481 on OpenAlexaff
Paul Hickson, Mark Barnet, Shaojie Chen, Olivier Lardière, Suresh Sivanandam, Saakshi Turakhia

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced optical system design
Canadian institutionsHerzberg Institute of AstrophysicsUniversity of TorontoUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLens (geology)CalibrationField (mathematics)Computer scienceOpticsPhysicsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Gemini Infrared Multi-Object Spectrograph (GIRMOS) will bring high-resolution integral-field spectroscopic and imaging capability to the Gemini North observatory. Designed to work with the Gemini North Adaptive Optics system, it has a multi-object adaptive optics capability that will provide increased resolution and sensitivity for the selected targets. The GIRMOS Calibration System (CAL) is an integral part of the GIRMOS instrument, providing photometric, spectroscopic and metrology calibration. A recent addition to GIRMOS is a field lens assembly (FLA), mechanically integrated with CAL, that provides a telecentric beam and optical shutter. This paper summarizes the final design, mechanical analysis, and optical tolerance analysis of the CAL/FLA subsystem.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.033

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced optical system designFrench-language works237,207