MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399663481 · doi:10.1117/12.3019216

Final design and opto-mechanical analysis of the GIRMOS calibration system and field lens assembly

2024· article· en· W4399663481 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced optical system design
Canadian institutionsHerzberg Institute of AstrophysicsUniversity of TorontoUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLens (geology)CalibrationField (mathematics)Computer scienceOpticsPhysicsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Gemini Infrared Multi-Object Spectrograph (GIRMOS) will bring high-resolution integral-field spectroscopic and imaging capability to the Gemini North observatory. Designed to work with the Gemini North Adaptive Optics system, it has a multi-object adaptive optics capability that will provide increased resolution and sensitivity for the selected targets. The GIRMOS Calibration System (CAL) is an integral part of the GIRMOS instrument, providing photometric, spectroscopic and metrology calibration. A recent addition to GIRMOS is a field lens assembly (FLA), mechanically integrated with CAL, that provides a telecentric beam and optical shutter. This paper summarizes the final design, mechanical analysis, and optical tolerance analysis of the CAL/FLA subsystem.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.954
Threshold uncertainty score0.227

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced optical system designFrench-language works237,207