MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399663640 · doi:10.1117/12.3021442

TIME, the Tomographic Ionized-carbon Mapping Experiment: an update on design, characterization, and data from the 2022 commissioning observations

2024· article· en· W4399663640 on OpenAlexaff
Victoria Butler, A. T. Crites, Samantha Berek, Jamie Bock, Geoffrey C. Bower, Charles M. Bradford, Tessalie-Caze Cortez, Tzu‐Ching Chang, Yun-Ting Cheng, Dongwoo T. Chung, Asantha Corray, Audrey Dunn, Nick Emerson, Clifford Frez, Francie Wharton, Caidan Pilarski, Sarah Gates, Caleb Greenberg, Fiona Hufford, Jonathon Hunacek, Ryan Keenan, Baria Khan, K. Lau, Chao-Te Li, Ian Lowe, Paolo Madonia, Daniel P. Marrone, Evan C. Mayer, Lorenzo Moncelsi, Sofia S. Pereira, Dang Pham, Ibrahim Shehzad, S. Singh, Guochao Sun, Isaac Trumper, Anthony N. Turner, Benjamin Vaughan, Ta-Shun Wei, Quinn Wilson, M. Zemcov

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNuclear Physics and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIntensity (physics)IonizationComputer scienceTomographic reconstructionEnvironmental scienceOpticsPhysicsArtificial intelligenceIterative reconstruction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We summarize the technical specifications of TIME, the Tomographic Ionized-carbon Mapping Experiment, which is designed to probe the structure and evolution of the universe by using line intensity mapping to measure carbon monoxide (CO) and ionized carbon ([C ii]) with a mm-wavelength grating spectrometer. We present detector count, spectral coverage and resolution, and give an update on the current status of the project. TIME was installed at the Arizona Radio Observatory 12 m telescope in 2019 and returned for further engineering, commissioning, and observing in 2022. Data taken during the 2022 season demonstrate the ability of TIME to compensate for field rotation through the use of a K-mirror system, as well as spectro-imaging functionality broadly in line with expectations given the current state of the instrument. TIME will return to ARO for science observations for the Winter 2024 season. We discuss hardware and software updates and preliminary data analysis in preparation for science scans.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.028

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.060
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicNuclear Physics and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207