MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4399663842 · doi:10.1117/12.3020443

Calibration measurements of the BICEP3 and BICEP array CMB polarimeters from 2017 to 2024

2024· article· en· W4399663842 on OpenAlexaff
Christos Giannakopoulos, C. Vergès, Peter A. R. Ade, A. Zeeshan, M. Amiri, Denis Barkats, R. Basu Thakur, Colin A. Bischoff, D. Beck, J. J. Bock, Hans Boenish, Victor Buza, James R. Cheshire, Jake Connors, James Cornelison, M. Crumrine, A. Cukierman, Edward V. Denison, M. Dierickx, L. Duband, Miranda Eiben, Brodi Elwood, S. Fatigoni, J. P. Filippini, Antonio Fortes, Min Gao, N. Goeckner-Wald, D. C. Goldfinger, James A. Grayson, Paul Grimes, Grantland Hall, George Halal, Mark Halpern, E. Hand, S. Harrison, Shawn Henderson, Johannes Hubmayr, H. Hui, K. D. Irwin, J. Kang, Kirit S. Karkare, Sinan Kefeli, J. M. Kovac, Chao‐Lin Kuo, Margaret Lautzenhiser, Amber R. Lennox, T. Liu, Krikor G. Megerian, Oliver Miller, Lorenzo Minutolo, Lorenzo Moncelsi, Yuka Nakato, Hien T. Nguyen, Roger O’Brient, Anika Patel, Matthew A. Petroff, Anna Rose Polish, Nathan Precup, Thomas Prouvé, C. Pryke, Carl D. Reintsema, Thibault Romand, Maria Salatino, A. Schillaci, Benjamin L. Schmitt, Baibhav Singari, Ahmed Soliman, T. St. Germaine, A. Steiger, Bryan Steinbach, R. Sudiwala, K. Thompson, C. Tsai, C. Tucker, Anthony D. Turner, A. G. Vieregg, Albert Wandui, Alexis C. Weber, Justin Willmert, Wai Ling K. Wu, Cyndia Yu, Lingzhen Zeng, Cheng Zhang, Silvia Zhang

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstronomy and Astrophysical Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCalibrationCosmic microwave backgroundComputer sciencePhysicsRemote sensingGeologyOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The BICEP3 and BICEP Array polarimeters are small-aperture refracting telescopes located at the South Pole designed to measure primordial gravitational wave signatures in the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) polarization, predicted by inflation. Constraining the inflationary signal requires not only excellent sensitivity, but also careful control of instrumental systematics. Both instruments use antenna-coupled orthogonally polarized detector pairs, and the polarized sky signal is reconstructed by taking the difference in each detector pair. As a result, the differential response between detectors within a pair becomes an important systematic effect we must control. Additionally, mapping the intensity and polarization response in regions away from the main beam can inform how sidelobe levels affect CMB measurements. Extensive calibration measurements are taken in situ every austral summer for control of instrumental systematics and instrument characterisation. In this work, we detail the set of beam calibration measurements that we conduct on the BICEP receivers, from deep measurements of main beam response to polarized beam response and sidelobe mapping. We discuss the impact of these measurements for instrumental systematics studies and design choices for future CMB receivers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAstronomy and Astrophysical Research→French-language works237,207→