Resilient Event Triggered Interval Type‐2 Fuzzy Sliding Mode Control for Connected and Autonomous Vehicles Subjected to Multiple Cyber Attacks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Connected and autonomous vehicles (CAVs) are considered a hot area of research in the field of intelligent transportation systems. However, over the past few years, cybersecurity threats have posed significant challenges to such systems, given the ever‐evolving automotive industry. Thus, there is a growing need to design resilient control strategies to address the issue of cyberattacks. This article proposes the design of a distributed multiagent expert control scheme for cyberattack‐resilient control of CAVs. The study implemented an event‐triggered consensus‐based attack detection scheme capable of distinguishing between replay (RA), denial‐of‐service (DoS), and false data injection (FDI) attacks. The attacks in this study occur randomly, are bounded and time‐varying, and can overlap with each other. It was demonstrated that by considering an estimator error bound ε for the attacked signal reconstruction, the SMC controller in feedback with a vehicle remains stable in the sense of Lyapunov. Conditions were then provided that guarantee global asymptotic stability for a minimum dwell‐time constraint , and the platoon was shown to be string stable for the minimum distance between vehicles, denoted as . Finally, the performance of the control strategy was evaluated using multiple performance indices, considering platoons of varying sizes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".