MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399665812 · doi:10.1109/msp.2024.3349456

Hypercomplex Processing of Vector Field Seismic Data: Toward vector-valued signal processing

2024· article· en· W4399665812 on OpenAlexaff
Breno Bahia, Arash JafarGandomi, Mauricio D. Sacchi

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Signal Processing Magazine · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicSeismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHypercomplex numberSignal processingImage processingComputer scienceMultidimensional signal processingField (mathematics)Data processingArtificial intelligenceComputer visionDigital image processingSIGNAL (programming language)Digital signal processingPattern recognition (psychology)AlgorithmSpeech recognitionMathematicsQuaternionImage (mathematics)Computer hardwarePure mathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Vector-valued signals are crucial in science and engineering. The evolving field of hypercomplex signal processing, particularly quaternion algebra, offers a concise and natural approach to handling vectorial data. In multicomponent seismology, for instance, vector-valued signal processing finds a natural fit that has been exploited in several applications. This article provides a concise and practical review of quaternionic methods for handling vector-valued seismic datasets, from historical origins to key concepts and tools in the field of quaternion signal processing, such as the quaternion Fourier transform and quaternion singular value decomposition (SVD). While highlighting existing results, this review also showcases novel developments through source separation applications with quaternions, discussing encountered challenges and outlining potential future trends.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Signal Processing MagazineSame topicSeismic Imaging and Inversion TechniquesFrench-language works237,207