Association of Psychological Resilience, Cognitive Reserve, and Brain Reserve with Post-Concussive Symptoms in Children with Mild Traumatic Brain Injury and Orthopedic Injury: An A-CAP Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Protective factors, including psychological resilience, cognitive reserve, and brain reserve, may be positively associated with recovery after pediatric mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) but are yet to be studied concurrently. We sought to examine these factors as moderators of post-concussive symptoms (PCS) in pediatric mTBI compared with mild orthopedic injury (OI). Participants included 967 children (633 mTBI, 334 OI) aged 8–16.99 years, recruited from 5 Canadian pediatric emergency departments as part of a prospective longitudinal cohort study. At 10 days post-injury, psychological resilience was measured using the Connor–Davidson Resilience Scale and brain reserve was measured using total brain volume derived from structural magnetic resonance imaging. Cognitive reserve was measured at 3 months post-injury using IQ scores from the Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence-Second Edition. Cognitive and somatic PCS were measured using child and parent ratings on the Health and Behavior Inventory, completed weekly for 3 months and biweekly to 6 months. Analyses involved generalized least-squares regression models using restricted cubic splines. Covariates included age at injury, sex, racialized identity, material and social deprivation, pre-injury migraine and concussion history, and retrospective pre-injury PCS. Psychological resilience moderated group differences in parent-reported PCS. At 30 days post-injury, estimated group differences in parent-reported cognitive and somatic PCS (mTBI > OI) were larger at higher (75th percentile) resilience scores (Est = 2.25 [0.87, 3.64] and Est = 2.38 [1.76, 3.00], respectively) than at lower (25th percentile) resilience scores (Est = 1.44 [0.01, 2.86] and Est = 2.08 [1.45, 2.71], respectively). Resilience did not moderate group differences in child-reported PCS but was negatively associated with child-reported PCS in both groups (ps ≤ 0.001). Brain reserve (i.e., total brain volume [TBV]) also moderated group differences, but only for parent-reported somatic PCS (p = 0.018). Group difference (mTBI > OI) at 30 days was larger at smaller (25th percentile) TBV (Est = 2.78 [2.17, 3.38]) than at larger (75th percentile) TBV (Est = 1.95 [1.31, 2.59]). TBV was not associated with parent-reported cognitive PCS or child-reported PCS. IQ did not moderate PCS in either group but had a significant non-linear association in both groups with child-reported somatic PCS (p = 0.018) and parent-reported PCS (p < 0.001), with higher PCS scores at both lower and higher IQs. These findings suggest that higher resilience predicts fewer PCS, but less strongly after mTBI than OI; greater brain reserve may reduce the effect of mTBI on somatic PCS; and cognitive reserve has an unexpected curvilinear association with PCS across injury types. The results highlight the importance of protective factors as predictors of recovery and potential targets for intervention following pediatric mTBI.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".