MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399673345 · doi:10.52340/ggj.2024.04.01.02

Some Questions about the Safe Operation of Short Road Tunnels

2024· article· en· W4399673345 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Омар Ланчава

Bibliographic record

VenueGEORGIAN GEOGRAPHICAL JOURNAL · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGeotechnical and Geomechanical Engineering
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuarter (Canadian coin)Ventilation (architecture)Jet (fluid)Promotion (chess)EngineeringHazardous wasteEnvironmental scienceCivil engineeringTransport engineeringMeteorologyGeographyLawMechanical engineeringAerospace engineeringArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The article looks at the statistical data on fires in short tunnels. It notes that about a quarter of road tunnel fires are classified as strong ones. The analysis is made according to the standards of the USA, the leading industrial country in the world. Underground fire scenarios are analysed and it is shown that for descending ventilation flows, there occurs a strong back-layering on the fresh air jet. The reason for this is an algebraic summation of mechanically and thermally induced underground ventilation flows and the insufficiency of the generally accepted numerical value of critical velocity of 3.0 m/s in the case of a great tunnel slope and strong fires. Noteworthy among the fire-fighting measures are equipping the tunnel with measuring devices; training the tunnel service personnel and rescuers; imposing transportation regimes for heavy hazardous cargoes; information support and promotion of the issue.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.830
Threshold uncertainty score0.511

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGEORGIAN GEOGRAPHICAL JOURNALSame topicGeotechnical and Geomechanical EngineeringFrench-language works237,207