MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399677635 · doi:10.54861/27131211_2024_5_28

THE MODEL OF PREFERENTIAL PROVISION OF LAND PLOTS FOR INDIVIDUAL HOUSING CONSTRUCTION

2024· article· ru· W4399677635 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueПрогрессивная экономика · 2024
Typearticle
Languageru
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicRegional Socio-Economic Development Trends
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReal estateUrbanizationIncentiveBusinessQuality (philosophy)Quarter (Canadian coin)Public economicsEconomicsEconomic growthMarket economyFinanceGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Целью данной статьи является разработка предложений, способствующих обеспечить доступность жилья для граждан Российской Федерации. Автором проанализирована динамика средних значений показателей цен за кв. м квартир в новостройках, представлены факторы, служащие причиной резкого и продолжительного роста цен на жилье. Сделан вывод о том, что жилье становится все менее доступным для приобретения: прирост цен на жилье опережает прирост доходов населения, ситуация усугубляется инфляционными процессами, повышением цен на других рынках экономических благ. Автором в процессе достижения цели исследования проведен критический анализ литературы, посвященной льготным мерам в отношении обеспечения граждан жильем. Рассмотрены такие меры поддержки как налоговые льготы на недвижимость, социальное жилье и льготная ипотека. Сделан вывод о недостаточности подобных мер в современных условиях. В процессе исследования предложена авторская модель льготного предоставления земельных участков под индивидуальную жилищную застройку. Обозначены предпосылки к созданию данной льготной программы, предложен новый вид разрешенного использования земельных участков, сформированы требования к участникам программы и объектам недвижимости, выделены возможные мультипликативные эффекты. Социальные эффекты предложенных мероприятий поддержки отражаются в повышении доступности базовых потребностей граждан в жилье, повышении качества жизни, с учетом отрицательных последствий урбанизации, а также поддержке инициатив граждан в развитии строительства и территорий страны. Предполагается, что подобные меры поспособствуют решению проблем доступности жилья, а также развитию территорий. The purpose of this article is to develop proposals that will help ensure the availability of housing for citizens of the Russian Federation. The author analyzes the dynamics of average values of price indicators per quarter. m apartments in new buildings, the factors that cause a sharp and prolonged increase in housing prices are presented. It is concluded that housing is becoming less affordable for purchase: the increase in housing prices outstrips the increase in household incomes, the situation is aggravated by inflationary processes, price increases in other markets of economic benefits. In the process of achieving the research goal, the author conducted a critical analysis of the literature on preferential measures in relation to housing provision for citizens. Such support measures as tax incentives for real estate, social housing and preferential mortgages are considered. The conclusion is made about the insufficiency of such measures in modern conditions. In the course of the research, the author's model of preferential provision of land plots for individual housing development is proposed. The prerequisites for the creation of this preferential program are outlined, a new type of permitted use of land plots is proposed, requirements for program participants and real estate objects are formed, possible multiplicative effects are highlighted. The social effects of the proposed support measures are reflected in increasing the accessibility of basic housing needs of citizens, improving the quality of life, taking into account the negative consequences of urbanization, as well as supporting citizens' initiatives in the development of construction and the country's territories. It is assumed that such measures will contribute to solving the problems of housing affordability, as well as the development of territories.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.526
Threshold uncertainty score0.877

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.066
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it