Joint Association of Sleep Onset Time and Sleep Duration With Cardiometabolic Health Outcome
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The association of sleep onset time and duration with cardiometabolic health is not well characterized. METHODS AND RESULTS: This study included 6696 adults aged 20 to 80 years from the NHANES (National Health and Nutrition Examination Study) 2015 to 2018. Participants were categorized into 9 groups according to the cross-tabulation of sleep onset time (<22:00 [early], 22:00-23:59 [optimal], and ≥24:00 [late]) and duration (<7 hours [insufficient], 7-8 hours [sufficient], and ≥9 hours [excessive]), with optimal sleep onset time and sufficient duration as the reference. The primary outcomes included hypertension, hypertriglyceridemia, low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, hyperglycemia, central obesity, and metabolic syndrome. Inappropriate sleep onset time and sleep duration were associated with increased odds of hypertension, hypertriglyceridemia, and metabolic syndrome, especially among participants aged 40 to 59 years. Compared with men reporting optimal onset and sufficient duration, men reporting optimal onset with excessive duration (odds ratio [OR]: 2.01 [95% CI, 1.12-3.58]) and late onset with insufficient duration (OR, 1.74 [95% CI, 1.13-2.68]) had higher odds of metabolic syndrome. Compared with women reporting optimal onset and sufficient duration, women reporting optimal onset and insufficient duration (OR, 1.61 [95% CI, 1.11-2.32]) and early onset and excessive duration (OR, 2.16 [95% CI, 1.30-3.57]) had higher odds of hypertension, and women reporting late onset and excessive duration (OR, 5.64 [95% CI, 1.28-6.77]) were at the highest odds of hypertriglyceridemia. CONCLUSIONS: Late sleep onset as well as insufficient or excessive sleep duration are associated with adverse cardiometabolic outcomes, particularly in participants aged 40 to 59 years.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".