MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399678795 · doi:10.1016/j.healun.2024.04.065

An ISHLT consensus statement on strategies to prevent and manage hemocompatibility related adverse events in patients with a durable, continuous-flow ventricular assist device

2024· review· en· W4399678795 on OpenAlexaff
Ian B. Hollis, Douglas L. Jennings, Selim R. Krim, Van‐Khue Ton, Anique Ducharme, Jennifer Cowger, Mary Looby, J J Eulert-Green, Neha Bansal, Ed Horn, Mirnela Byku, Jason N. Katz, Indranee Rajapreyar, Patrick Campbell, Cassandra Vale, Richard Cosgrove, Jaime Hernández-Montfort, Jésica Abadía‐Otero, Amanda I. Ingemi, Shashi Raj, Phillip Weeks, Richa Agarwal, Elena S Martinez, Mustafa M. Ahmed, Amy L. Kiskaddon, Jamila Kremer, Mary Keebler, Ravi K Ratnagiri

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation · 2024
Typereview
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMechanical Circulatory Support Devices
Canadian institutionsMontreal Heart Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAdverse effectMedicineStatement (logic)Intensive care medicineContinuous flowComputer scienceInternal medicineEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.037

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.003
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations36
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Heart and Lung TransplantationSame topicMechanical Circulatory Support DevicesFrench-language works237,207