MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399679264 · doi:10.1007/s44202-024-00192-9

Self-compassion, burnout, and biomarkers in a sample of healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional correlational study

2024· article· en· W4399679264 on OpenAlexaffabout
Catherine Bégin, Mahée Gilbert‐Ouimet, Manon Truchon

Bibliographic record

VenueDiscover Psychology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicMindfulness and Compassion Interventions
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à RimouskiUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBurnoutSelf-compassionDepersonalizationMindfulnessHealth careEmotional exhaustionCompassion fatiguePsychological interventionClinical psychologyPsychologyCross-sectional studyMedicineCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)CompassionPsychiatryDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Burnout among healthcare professionals is a serious problem with multiple consequences for the individuals and organizations affected. Thus, accessible and effective interventions are still needed to prevent and attenuate burnout. Self-compassion has recently been well supported in preventing and reducing burnout in various professions. Current research also demonstrated protective associations between self-compassion and well-being and/or psychological health indicators. Few studies are available on this topic during the COVID-19 pandemic or on healthcare workers from Quebec or Canada. Moreover, only a limited number of studies have looked at the associations of self-compassion with physiological variables. This cross-sectionnal correlational study attempts to evaluate the association between self-compassion and burnout, among healthcare workers from Quebec (Canada) during the COVID-19 pandemic (n = 416 participants). Associations between their respective components are also tested. A secondary objective is to evaluate if self-compassion is also associated with a set of 38 biomarkers of inflammation (n = 83 participants), potentially associated with the physiological stress response according to the literature. Participants meeting eligibility criteria (e.g.: residing in the province of Quebec, being 18 years of age or older, speaking French, and having been involved in providing care to COVID-19 patients) were recruited online. Participants completed the Occupational Health and Well-being Questionnaire, and some participated in a blood sample collection protocol. Results Results showed significant negative associations between self-compassion, exhaustion, and depersonalization, and a significant positive correlation with professional efficacy. Some self-compassion subscales (mindfulness, self-judgment, isolation, overidentification) were significantly negatively associated with certain biomarkers, even after controlling for confounding variables. Conclusions This study adds to the existing literature by supporting the association of self-compassion with burnout, and reveals associations between self-compassion and physiological biomarkers related to the stress response. Future research directions are discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.197
Threshold uncertainty score0.392

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.067
GPT teacher head0.434
Teacher spread0.367 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDiscover PsychologySame topicMindfulness and Compassion InterventionsFrench-language works237,207