"As accurate as memory": The Making of Basil H. Johnston's Indian School Days
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract: This article unveils the personal dedication of author Basil H. Johnston, together with the professional commitment of his publisher Anna Porter and agent Beverley Slopen, that led to the production and dissemination of Indian School Days . Published in 1988 by Toronto's Key Porter Books, Indian School Days was the first memoir to focus entirely on the Indian residential school experience in Canada and the first written by an Anishinaabemowin speaker. Drawing on primary material—archival documents held in the Basil H. Johnston fonds at McMaster University in Hamilton, Ontario, as well as my 2022 interview with his daughter, Tibby Johnston—the article argues for the distinctive allyship of Porter and Slopen with Johnston, three figures united in sensibility and purpose. Individually, each valued mutual understanding alongside career success and sought to challenge the prevailing bias against Indigenous writing within mainstream publishing. Collectively, they grasped the corrective significance of Indian School Days —as a work of remembrance, history, and art—and fostered awareness for a book that was central to the rise of Indigenous writing in Canada.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.030 | 0.040 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.020 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.008 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.007 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".