Ant colony algorithms for minimizing costs in multi-mode resource constrained project scheduling problems with spatial constraints
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper addresses the problem of activity scheduling and operator assignment in workstations of aerospace assembly lines. The problem is modelled as a new variant of the Multi-Mode Resource Constrained Project Scheduling Problem (MRCPSP), which incorporates practical features from aerospace workstations in assembly lines. These workstations have a substantial number of activities to be scheduled within a given assembly cycle time. It introduces particularities which are not usually addressed such as considering additional workers for performing activities, different workers’ proficiency, and spatial limitations in work zones. The objective is to schedule the activities of an aerospace workstation, minimising the total labour cost, while satisfying the cycle time and the zone’s limitations. The problem is initially formulated by employing mixed-integer linear programming methods with mathematical modelling and solved using two different algorithms: an Ant Colony System (ACS) and a memetic ACS. Given the novelty of the problem presented, new sets of benchmark cases of different sizes for this problem are also proposed and solved. To assess the performance of the algorithms, the solutions for the small-sized instances are compared in terms of deviation with the results obtained by an optimisation modelling software. Further experimentation with the algorithms is carried out with medium and large instances, showing good performance and providing reasonably good results in realistic problems.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it