Introduce free replacement extended warranty and bundle it? Optimal new extended warranty introduction strategy
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To meet consumer replacement needs, the free replacement extended warranty (FREW) is born and becomes popular in the extended warranty (EW) market. In this context, firms need to consider whether to introduce the FREW. Given the limited resources of the firms and cannibalism caused by the FREW, firms need to decide how to introduce the FREW. To address these issues, we construct theoretical models and obtain some managerial insights. We find that the optimal introduction strategy is related to the development cost and the expansion effect on the product market. Moreover, the optimal bundling strategy is affected by the unit maintenance cost and the cost discount caused by the FREW. Only when the benefit of the FREW is great enough, is bundling always better. An interesting result is that the price of the bundled EW is higher than the sum of the EWs’ prices when selling EWs separately.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it