MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399685960 · doi:10.5267/j.jpm.2024.5.001

Development of a prototype system integration model for RFID technology with the internet of things and its implementation to improve precast concrete material management in Indonesia

2024· article· en· W4399685960 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Priangga Arganiz, Fadhilah Muslim

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Project Management · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRFID technology advancements
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversitas Indonesia
KeywordsPrecast concreteInternet of ThingsThe InternetConstruction engineeringComputer scienceEngineeringSystems engineeringCivil engineeringWorld Wide Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The adoption of technology in Indonesian construction is still developing at a slower pace than in other sectors, particularly in materials management. Among the automation technologies that can be developed for precast material management, is integrated RFID technology with the Internet of Things (IoT). This study therefore aims to analyze the correlation between factors influencing the implementation of integrated RFID technology with IoT for precast material management in Indonesia and to examine the development model of the integrated RFID technology system with IoT. The research methods include a questionnaire survey with PLS-SEM and the development of technology systems validated by experts. The results demonstrate that factors, such as resource availability, implementation cost, stakeholder involvement, implementation risk, and project conditions have a significant direct and indirect impact on the implementation of integrated RFID technology with IoT for precast material management. Among these factors, the implementation of risk factors has the most significant influence. Furthermore, the development of the integrated RFID technology system with IoT has proven to be beneficial, especially as an automation technology for data recording and visibility in precast material management.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.591
Threshold uncertainty score0.396

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Project ManagementSame topicRFID technology advancementsFrench-language works237,207