MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399687821 · doi:10.2337/db24-1454-p

1454-P: Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events, Advanced Foot Complications, and Subsequent Risk of Diabetic Ketoacidosis in Type 1 Diabetes

2024· article· en· W4399687821 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Priya Bapat, Dalton Budhram, Abdulmohsen Bakhsh, Mohammad I. Abuabat, Natasha J. Verhoeff, Doug Mumford, Andrej Orszag, Michael Fralick, Alanna Weisman, LEIF ERIK LOVBLOM, BRUCE A. PERKINS

Bibliographic record

VenueDiabetes · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicDiabetes and associated disorders
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineDiabetic ketoacidosisDiabetes mellitusKetoacidosisType 2 diabetesAdverse effectType 1 diabetesInternal medicineIntensive care medicinePediatricsEndocrinology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction & Objective: People with type 1 diabetes and diabetes-related complications, including cardiovascular disease, are at increased risk of morbidity and mortality. We aimed to determine if major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and microvascular complications independently predict the risk of subsequent diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA). Methods: We accessed previously-collected data from the DCCT/EDIC Study through the NIDDK Central Repository. We used Multivariable Cox Proportional Hazard models with time-varying exposures and co-variates to examine associations of MACE and microvascular complications (early- and late-stages of neuropathy, nephropathy, and retinopathy) as the exposure, with the subsequent occurrence of DKA as the outcome. Results: Of 1441 participants, 297 individuals experienced 488 DKA events over 34 years of follow-up. MACE [hazard ratio (HR) 3.11, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.56-6.17, p=0.001] and late-stage neuropathy, which comprised of foot ulcer or amputation, (HR 1.61, 95% CI 1.06-2.45 p=0.026) were independently associated with higher risk of DKA. Higher DKA risk was also associated with insulin pump use (HR 3.01, 95% CI 2.28-3.98, p<0.001), higher insulin dose (HR for 1 unit/kg/day 2.39, 95% CI 1.72-3.33, p<0.001), female sex (HR 2.01, 95% CI 1.58-2.56, p<0.001), and higher time-updated HbA1c (HR for 1 percent 1.41, 95% CI 1.32-1.51, p<0.001). Conclusion: In those with type 1 diabetes, a major cardiovascular event, foot ulcer or amputation confers the greatest risk of future DKA independent of previously-recognized risk factors. These findings imply a need to target patients with these events for DKA prevention interventions such as self-management skills for metabolic control, management of depression, and education around DKA. Disclosure P. Bapat: None. D.R. Budhram: None. A.M.K. Bakhsh: None. M.I. Abuabat: None. N. Verhoeff: None. D. Mumford: None. A. Orszag: None. M. Fralick: Consultant; singal1, proofdx. A. Weisman: None. L. Lovblom: None. B.A. Perkins: Advisory Panel; Abbott. Other Relationship; Novo Nordisk. Advisory Panel; Insulet Corporation, Nephris. Other Relationship; Medtronic. Advisory Panel; Sanofi, Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated, Dexcom, Inc. Funding Diabetes Canada (Operating Grant OG-3-21-5572-BP)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.031

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDiabetesSame topicDiabetes and associated disordersFrench-language works237,207