Incorporating Microbial Pilin-Based Nanowires into a Water-Stable Electronic Polymer Composite
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Electrically conductive protein nanowires (e-PNs), microbially produced from a pilin monomer, are a novel, sustainable electronic material that can be genetically tailored for specific functions. e-PNs, expressed with Escherichia coli grown on the biodiesel byproduct glycerol, and mixed with polyvinyl butyral yielded a transparent, electrically conductive water-stable composite.Composite conductivity was adjusted by modifying the e-PN concentration or incorporating e-PNs genetically tuned for different conductivities. Electronic devices in which composites were the sensor component differentially responded to dissolved ammonia over a wide concentration range (1µM-1M). Genetically modifying e-PNs to display an ammonia-binding peptide on their outer surface increased the sensor response to ammonia 10-fold. These results, coupled with the flexibility to design peptides for specific binding of diverse analytes, demonstrate that sustainably produced e-PNs offer the possibility of incorporating multiple sensor components, each specifically designed to detect different analytes with high sensitivity and selectivity, within one small sensor device.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".