MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399696814 · doi:10.1016/j.scenv.2024.100126

Converting food waste to biofuel: A sustainable energy solution for Sub-Saharan Africa

2024· article· en· W4399696814 on OpenAlexaff
Ramadhani Bakari, Asha Ripanda, Miraji Hossein, Xiao Huang, Nazim Forid Islam, Rock Keey Liew, Mahesh Narayan, Su Shiung Lam, Hemen Sarma

Bibliographic record

VenueSustainable Chemistry for the Environment · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEnergy and Environment Impacts
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
FundersUniversity of DodomaThe World Academy of Sciences
KeywordsGreenhouse gasBiofuelFossil fuelEnvironmental scienceFood wasteWaste managementNatural resource economicsEnvironmental protectionEnvironmental pollutionRenewable energyCoalEngineeringEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Natural gas, coal, and oil account for over 84 % of the world’s energy demand. Greenhouse gases, including carbon dioxide, methane, and oxides of nitrogen and sulphur, are released during the combustion of fossil fuels, leading to substantial climate changes and environmental damage. Therefore, harnessing energy from alternative sustainable resources without the emission of harmful waste products is vital for the ecosystem’s health. By 2050, global food waste production will reach 3.4 billion metric tons. Although widely recognized as a substantial energy resource, its value is underutilized throughout sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). Therefore, understanding and exploiting the potential value of food waste as a biofuel can result in net-zero emissions, reducing significant environmental pollution while conserving natural resources. Furthermore, this paper reviews how effective management of food waste will have the potential to contribute to the development of waste-to-energy resources in SSA countries, as well as help improve global ecosystems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.653
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations23
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSustainable Chemistry for the EnvironmentSame topicEnergy and Environment ImpactsFrench-language works237,207