MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399697948 · doi:10.1016/j.cropro.2024.106814

Comparison of two release strategies for the American hoverfly, Eupeodes americanus, against the green peach aphid in greenhouses: Banker plant vs. pupal release

2024· article· en· W4399697948 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueCrop Protection · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicInsect and Pesticide Research
Canadian institutionsVineland Research and Innovation CentreUniversité du Québec à Montréal
FundersAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
KeywordsBiologyAphidPupaGreenhouseHorticultureAgronomyBotanyLarva

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Predatory hoverflies can provide dual ecosystem services since adults are pollinators and larvae are aphidophagous biocontrol agents. In the present study, we compare the effects of two release strategies, banker plant and pupal release on the potential of the American hoverfly, Eupeodes americanus to control Myzus persicae and to improve pollination of sweet pepper ( Capsicum annuum ) in research greenhouses. Results show that E. americanus effectively controls aphids regardless of the release strategy with an infestation reduction ranging from 91 to 99% depending on the year. However, the production of new adult hoverflies over time without needing additional releases is an advantage of the banker plant strategy. Indeed, adults’ number were multiplied by 7 throughout the duration of the experiment, i.e., 8 weeks while the pupal release strategy had a constant number of adults with no increase. Finally, the use of E. americanus significantly increased the fruit yield by 88.4% and 97.5% respectively for banker plant and pupae release treatments compared to the control. However, further studies are necessary to confirm its impact on pollination of sweet pepper plant since a greater occurrence of malformation in fruit occurred in both hoverfly treatments. In conclusion, the present study is the first to clearly demonstrate that E. americanus is an efficient predator against M. persicae via banker plant or pupal release. It also reveals its potential as a pollinator, another key ecosystem service in agricultural production. • E. americanus is an efficient predator against M. persicae . • Banker plant or pupal release strategies reduce infestation between 91 and 99%. • Banker plant considerably increases the hoverfly population without new releases. • E. americanus increased the fruit yield regardless of the release strategy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.824
Threshold uncertainty score0.971

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.064
GPT teacher head0.331
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it