The Utility of Long-Read Sequencing in Diagnosing Genetic Autosomal Recessive Parkinson’s Disease: a genetic screening study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background Mutations within the genes PRKN and PINK1 are the leading cause of early onset autosomal recessive Parkinson’s disease (PD). However, the genetic cause of most early-onset PD (EOPD) cases still remains unresolved. Long-read sequencing has successfully identified many pathogenic structural variants that cause disease, but this technology has not been widely applied to PD. We recently identified the genetic cause of EOPD in a pair of monozygotic twins by uncovering a complex structural variant that spans over 7 Mb, utilizing Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT) long-read sequencing. In this study, we aimed to expand on this and assess whether a second variant could be detected with ONT long-read sequencing in other unresolved EOPD cases reported to carry one heterozygous variant in PRKN or PINK1 . Methods ONT long-read sequencing was performed on patients with one reported PRKN/PINK1 pathogenic variant. EOPD patients with an age at onset younger than 50 were included in this study. As a positive control, we also included EOPD patients who had already been identified to carry two known PRKN pathogenic variants. Initial genetic testing was performed using either short-read targeted panel sequencing for single nucleotide variants and multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) for copy number variants. Results 48 patients were included in this study ( PRKN “one-variant” n = 24, PINK1 “one-variant” n = 12, PRKN “two-variants” n = 12). Using ONT long-read sequencing, we detected a second pathogenic variant in six PRKN “one-variant” patients (26%, 6/23) but none in the PINK1 “one-variant” patients (0%, 0/12). Long-read sequencing identified one case with a complex inversion, two instances of structural variant overlap, and three cases of duplication. In addition, in the positive control PRKN “two-variants” group, we were able to identify both pathogenic variants in PRKN in all the patients (100%, 12/12). Conclusions This data highlights that ONT long-read sequencing is a powerful tool to identify a pathogenic structural variant at the PRKN locus that is often missed by conventional methods. Therefore, for cases where conventional methods fail to detect a second variant for EOPD, long-read sequencing should be considered as an alternative and complementary approach.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".