MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399700751 · doi:10.47197/retos.v56.102758

Fatigue Index, Haemoglobin Level and Physical Fitness: A Correlation Analysis Study

2024· article· en· W4399700751 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueRetos · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicSports and Physical Education Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysical fitnessStatisticsCorrelationSprintRegression analysisIndex (typography)Anaerobic exerciseSimple random sampleMathematicsLinear regressionPhysical therapyMedicinePopulationComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Physical fitness is one of the most important indicators in daily life, supported by various factors including fatigue index and haemoglobin levels. The purpose of this study was to determine: 1) the contribution of fatigue index to physical fitness, 2) the contribution of haemoglobin level to physical fitness, and 3) the contribution of fatigue index and haemoglobin level simultaneously to physical fitness. The research studied belongs to the type of quantitative research with a correlational approach and continued by calculating the amount of contribution of the independent variable (predictor) to the dependent variable (criterion) through the determination index, namely r2 x 100%. Sampling was carried out using purposive sampling technique and the sample amounted to 48 people. The characteristics of this research sample are active sports students aged 18.68 ± 0.86 years, height 165.38 ± 6.71 centimetres, and body weight 56.75 ± 9.70 kilograms. Fatigue Index was measured by Running Based Anaerobic Sprint Test (RAST Test), Haemoglobin Level was measured by Sahli method, and Physical fitness was measured by the Bleep Test. The data analysis techniques used were simple and multiple correlation analysis techniques. Hypotheses 1 and 2 were analysed by simple correlation and regression, while hypothesis 3 was analysed by correlation and multiple regression. Simple correlation and multiple regression analysis, this analysis is used to determine the contribution of fatigue index variables and haemoglobin levels to physical fitness. The results in this study are: 1) Fatigue index contributes to the level of physical fitness by 6.09%. 2) Haemoglobin levels contribute to the level of physical fitness by 9.14%, and 3) Fatigue index and haemoglobin levels together contribute to the level of physical fitness by 16.83%. Keywords: Fatigue Index, Haemoglobin Level, and Physical Fitness.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.069
Threshold uncertainty score0.852

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.184
GPT teacher head0.522
Teacher spread0.338 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it