MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399705433 · doi:10.1177/10812865231199544

A Volterra edge dislocation problem in second-order elasticity theory

2024· article· en· W4399705433 on OpenAlexaff
A. P. S. Selvadurai

Bibliographic record

VenueMathematics and Mechanics of Solids · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElasticity and Material Modeling
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiharmonic equationElasticity (physics)Airy functionMathematicsIsotropyMathematical analysisDisplacement (psychology)DislocationPlane stressClassical mechanicsPhysicsBoundary value problem

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A displacement function technique has been developed to study plane strain problems in second-order elasticity theory for incompressible elastic materials. The formulation culminates in the development of a single inhomogeneous biharmonic equation of the form [Formula: see text] for the second-order displacement function [Formula: see text]. In the second-order, the isotropic stress associated with constitutive behaviour is governed by an inhomogeneous harmonic equation of the form [Formula: see text]. Both functions [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] depend only on the solution to the analogous problem in classical elasticity. While there are similarities to the Airy stress function, the displacement function approach enables the evaluation of the first- and second-order displacement fields purely through its derivatives, thus eliminating the introduction of arbitrary rigid body terms normally associated with formulations where the strains derived from a stress function approach need to be integrated. The displacement function approach is applied to develop a second-order elasticity solution to the problem of a Volterra edge dislocation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.760
Threshold uncertainty score0.387

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMathematics and Mechanics of SolidsSame topicElasticity and Material ModelingFrench-language works237,207