MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399708511 · doi:10.1111/geb.13878

Wind dispersed tree species have greater maximum height

2024· article· en· W4399708511 on OpenAlexaff
Ferry Slik, Bruno X. Pinho, Daniel M. Griffith, Edward L. Webb, A. S. Raghubanshi, Adriano Costa Quaresma, Aida Cuní‐Sanchez, Aisha Sultana, Alexandre F. Souza, Andreas Enßlin, Andreas Hemp, Andrew J. Lowe, Andrew R. Marshall, K. Anitha, Anne Mette Lykke, Armadyanto, Mashhor Mansor, Atsri K. Honam, Axel Dalberg Poulsen, Ben Sparrow, Benjamin J. W. Buckley, Bernat Ripoll Capilla, Bianca Weiss Albuquerque, Christine B. Schmitt, Dharmalingam Mohandass, Diogo Souza Bezerra Rocha, Douglas Sheil, Eduardo A. Pérez‐García, Eduardo Luı́s Martins Catharino, Eduardo van den Berg, Ervan Rutishauser, Fabian Brambach, Felipe Zamborlini Saiter, Feyera Senbeta, Florian Wittmann, Francesco Rovero, Francisco Mora, Frans Bongers, Gabriella M. Fredriksson, Gemma Rutten, Gérard Imani, Gerardo A. Aymard C., Giselda Durigan, Gopal Shukla, Guadalupe Williams‐Linera, Heike Culmsee, Hendrik Segah, Íñigo Granzow‐de la Cerda, Jamuna Sharan Singh, James Grogan, Jan Reitsma, Jean‐François Bastin, Jeremy Lindsell, Jérôme Millet, João Roberto dos Santos, Jochen Schoengart, John Vandermeer, John Herbohn, Jon C. Lovett, Jorge A. Meave, José Roberto Rodrigues Pinto, Juan Carlos Montero, Kalle Ruokolainen, Khairil Mahmud, Layon Oreste Demarchi, Lourens Poorter, Luís Carlos Bernacci, Manichanh Satdichanh, Márcio Seiji Suganuma, María Teresa Fernández Piedade, Mariarty A. Niun, Mark E. Harrison, Mark Schulze, Markus Fischer, Michael Kessler, Miguel Castillo, Mohammad Shah Hussain, Moses B. Libalah, Muhammad Ali Imron, Narayanaswamy Parthasarathy, Naret Seuaturien, Natália Targhetta, Ni Putu Diana Mahayani, Nigel C. A. Pitman, Orlando Rangel, Pantaleo Munishi, Patricia Balvanera, Peter S. Ashton, Pia Parolin, Polyanna da Conceição Bispo, Priya Davidar, Rahayu Sukmaria Sukri, Rahmad Zakaria, P. Rama Chandra Prasad, Robert Steinmetz, R.M. Bellido Muñoz, Rozainah Mohamad Zakaria, Saara J. DeWalt, Hoàng Văn Sâm, Samir Rolim, Sharif A. Mukul, Siti Maimunah, Swapan Kumar Sarker, Trey Sunderland, Thomas R. Gillespie, Tinde van Andel, Tran Van Do, Wanlop Chutipong, Runguo Zang, Xiaobo Yang, Xinghui Lu, Yves Laumonier, Zhila Hemati

Bibliographic record

VenueGlobal Ecology and Biogeography · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEcology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e TecnológicoLeverhulme TrustU.S. Fish and Wildlife ServiceArcus Foundation
KeywordsEcologyTree (set theory)GeographyEnvironmental scienceBiologyMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Aim We test the hypothesis that wind dispersal is more common among emergent tree species given that being tall increases the likelihood of effective seed dispersal. Location Americas, Africa and the Asia‐Pacific. Time period 1970–2020. Major taxa studied Gymnosperms and Angiosperms. Methods We used a dataset consisting of tree inventories from 2821 plots across three biogeographic regions (Americas, Africa and Asia‐Pacific), including dry and wet forests, to determine the maximum height and dispersal strategy of 5314 tree species. A web search was used to determine whether species were wind‐dispersed. We compared differences in tree species maximum height between biogeographic regions and examined the relationship between species maximum height and wind dispersal using logistic regression. We also tested whether emergent tree species, that is species with at least one individual taller than the 95% height percentile in one or more plots, were disproportionally wind‐dispersed in dry and wet forests within each biogeographic region. Results Our dataset provides maximum height values for 5314 tree species, of which more than half (2914) had no record of this trait in existing global databases. We found that, on average, tree species in the Americas have lower maximum heights compared to those in Africa and the Asia Pacific. The probability of wind dispersal increased significantly with tree species maximum height and was significantly higher among emergent than non‐emergent tree species in both dry and wet forests in all three biogeographic regions. Main conclusion Wind dispersal is more prevalent in tall, emergent tree species than in non‐emergent species and may thus be an important factor in the evolution of tree species maximum height. By providing the most comprehensive dataset so far of tree species maximum height and wind dispersal strategies, this study paves the way for advancing our understanding of the eco‐evolutionary drivers of tree size.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGlobal Ecology and BiogeographySame topicEcology and Vegetation Dynamics StudiesFrench-language works237,207