MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399710281 · doi:10.1016/j.erss.2024.103618

Scaling renewable energy cooperatives for a net-zero Canada: Challenges and opportunities for accelerating the energy transition

2024· article· en· W4399710281 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueEnergy Research & Social Science · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIntegrated Energy Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersSocial Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
KeywordsRenewable energyEnergy transitionZero-energy buildingZero (linguistics)ScalingNet (polyhedron)Energy (signal processing)Transition (genetics)Net energyZero-point energyBusinessNatural resource economicsEconomicsPhysicsEngineeringMedicineElectrical engineeringMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Employing a niche-management framework, we conduct a census of renewable energy cooperatives (RECs) to study their potential role in helping Canada achieve its net-zero greenhouse gas emission targets. Based on a review of more than 250 websites as well as 27 semi-structured interviews with representatives from RECs and cooperative associations across Canada, we find that Canada's REC sector is struggling to break out of its niche, with inconsistent and often unavailable data on energy production making it difficult to tally the sector's contribution. Nevertheless, based on the available data, we estimate that the sector contributed at most 73 MW, or less than 0.05 % to Canada's total installed capacity in 2021. We also find that the number of RECs declined by 44 % ( n = 40) between 2016 and 2021. While we found evidence of REC merger activity, the overwhelming picture is of a sector where volunteers are stretched and often forced to wind-up their cooperative. Drawing on cooperative scholarship and a scan of other jurisdictions, we note that RECs could follow the path of other cooperative sectors and become an important part of the regime by forming a second-tier cooperative association. • The number of active Renewable Energy Cooperatives (RECs) in Canada has decreased, with nearly half becoming inactive since 2015, and Ontario being the central hub of activity. • The energy production of active RECs is dominated by solar, followed by wind and biofuels, with a small focus on energy efficiency through home retrofits. • REC membership is primarily composed of investors, with a significant investment co-operative model in Ontario due to the feed-in-tariff program, while retail and employee ownership models are more common in British Columbia and Quebec. • RECs face substantial barriers including economic and operational challenges, policy restrictions, and social obstacles, with internal factors like board expertise and external factors like government funding and policy support identified as key enablers for success. • Despite the decline and challenges, there have been efforts to scale up RECs through second-tier organizations, but success requires overcoming significant barriers such as funding, expertise, and volunteer burnout, along with supportive government policies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.989
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.120
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it