An MRI evaluation of white matter involvement in paradigmatic forms of spastic ataxia: results from the multi-center PROSPAX study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Autosomal Recessive Spastic Ataxia of Charlevoix-Saguenay (ARSACS) and Spastic Paraplegia Type 7 (SPG7) are paradigmatic spastic ataxias (SPAX) with suggested white matter (WM) involvement. Aim of this work was to thoroughly disentangle the degree of WM involvement in these conditions, evaluating both macrostructure and microstructure via the analysis of diffusion MRI (dMRI) data. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this multi-center prospective study, ARSACS and SPG7 patients and Healthy Controls (HC) were enrolled, all undergoing a standardized dMRI protocol and a clinimetrics evaluation including the Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA). Differences in terms of WM volume or global microstructural WM metrics were probed, as well as the possible occurrence of a spatially defined microstructural WM involvement via voxel-wise analyses, and its correlation with patients' clinical status. RESULTS: Data of 37 ARSACS (M/F = 21/16; 33.4 ± 12.4 years), 37 SPG7 (M/F = 24/13; 55.7 ± 10.7 years), and 29 HC (M/F = 13/16; 42.1 ± 17.2 years) were analyzed. While in SPG7, only a mild mean microstructural damage was found compared to HC, ARSACS patients present a severe WM involvement, with a reduced global volume (p < 0.001), an alteration of all microstructural metrics (all with p < 0.001), without a spatially defined pattern of damage but with a prominent involvement of commissural fibers. Finally, in ARSACS, a correlation between microstructural damage and SARA scores was found (p = 0.004). CONCLUSION: In ARSACS, but not SPG7 patients, we observed a complex and multi-faced involvement of brain WM, with a clinically meaningful widespread loss of axonal and dendritic integrity, secondary demyelination and, overall, a reduction in cellularity and volume.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".