MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399722926 · doi:10.32920/26052625.v1

Parametric Design and Its Future Progression: How Parametric Housing Technology is the Future of Development

2024· preprint· en· W4399722926 on OpenAlexaff
Javad Riahifard

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicArchitecture and Computational Design
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsParametric statisticsSemiparametric modelParametric modelTechnology developmentParametric designComputer scienceEngineeringManufacturing engineeringMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The following research paper concentrates on the field of parametric housing technology and its ever-evolving progression. It establishes a point of origin, its history, and evolution, whilst demonstrating the different applications it can be associated with. Also, it will exhibit the connection it holds with datadriven technology along with artificial intelligence. The purpose of the topic at hand is to better understand how parametric housing technology can be considered the next stepping-stone in the world of construction and the urban development industry. With the use of different research articles and studies, the following paper will aim to establish the exact origin and history of parametric housing technology and its evolution. These articles and studies were obtained through the open-source web, libraries, academic and professional institutions, and statistical data from government websites. The use of data mapping throughout the paper allows for the establishment of different themes which highlight links between parametric housing technology and datadriven artificial intelligence, core principles of parametricisim along with its further evolution with respect to the construction industry and the relationship it holds with the architectural world of design. Parametric housing technology is a revolutionary movement that has been created and introduced to the architectural and construction industry through the force of necessity. Currently, the process which bounds the two worlds of construction and architecture is one where challenges are faced in terms of efficiency and productivity. This is mainly due to the absence of knowledge and communication between the two different industries which are both significant and crucial when it comes to any type of development. The way in which parametric housing technology solves this problem is through its accuracy and direct output which is easily translated and communicated into structural engineering blueprints. This ultimately allows architects and designers to produce ideas that are easily legible by developers and engineers as parametric housing technology permits design to be created through the scope of real-life scenarios set by variables and parameters of the surrounding site context.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.057

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0040.019
Scholarly communication0.0140.018
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicArchitecture and Computational DesignFrench-language works237,207