Mechanical ventilation in a conscious male during exercise: a case report
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We recently explored the cardiopulmonary interactions during partial unloading of the respiratory muscles during exercise. Expanding upon this work, we present a noteworthy case study whereby we eliminated the influence of respiration on cardiac function in a conscious but mechanically ventilated human during exercise. This human was a young healthy endurance-trained male who was mechanically ventilated during semi-recumbent cycle exercise at 75 Watts (W) (∼30% Wmax). During mechanically ventilated exercise, esophageal pressure was reduced to levels indistinguishable from the cardiac artefact which led to a 94% reduction in the power of breathing. The reduction in respiratory pressures and respiratory muscle work led to a decrease in cardiac output (−6%), which was due to a reduction in stroke volume (−13%), left ventricular end-diastolic volume (−15%), and left-ventricular end-systolic volume (−17%) that was not compensated for by heart rate. Our case highlights the influence of extreme mechanical ventilation on cardiac function while noting the possible presence of a maximal physiological limit to which respiration (and its associated pressures) impacts cardiac function when the power of breathing is maximally reduced.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.007 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".