MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399728171 · doi:10.32920/26046607.v1

Let's Talk About Bruno: An Analysis of Encanto and the Theme of Intergenerational Trauma

2024· preprint· en· W4399728171 on OpenAlexaff
Razan Monzer

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicAmerican and British Literature Analysis
Canadian institutionsProfessional Engineers Ontario
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTheme (computing)SociologyPsychoanalysisPsychologyComputer scienceWorld Wide Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<p>With the release of Disney's Encanto, the topic of intergenerational trauma has surfaced on social media and has been reintroduced into mainstream discourse. This paper analyzes the film that was released in November of 2021 and evaluates the concept of regression and character archetypes, aspects that may seem attractive and relatable to the audience. To understand the effect Encanto has had on the audience, samples were taken from TikTok and analyzed within context to determine how this film has resonated with its audience.</p>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.809
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAmerican and British Literature AnalysisFrench-language works237,207