MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399728252 · doi:10.32920/26046568

An Analysis of the Roma and Their Inclusion and Exclusion in Metropolitan Areas of Europe

2024· preprint· en· W4399728252 on OpenAlexaff
Tara Tarana

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicRomani and Gypsy Studies
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan UniversityUniversity of Guelph-Humber
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMetropolitan areaInclusion (mineral)Inclusion–exclusion principleRegional sciencePolitical scienceEconomic geographyGeographySociologyGender studiesArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<p>This study, utilizing the foundations of critical race theory (CRT), is examining how the policies and practices of inclusion and exclusion in two major European cities have affected marginalized minorities. It focuses on the migration patterns of the largest ethnic minority in Europe, the Roma, after the dissolution of the Former Socialist Republic of Yugoslavia (FRY) and the former Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (FSU), and reflects on the issues of inclusion and exclusion they faced duringand after thesespecific periods of forced migration. This major researchpaper centers around two case studies to analyze the position and agency of Roma people in Europe. The first is Roma within the Federal Republic of Germany (European Union) and the second is within the Republic of Serbia (non-European Union), with a specific focus on the cities of Belgrade and Berlin.</p>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesOpen science
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.064
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.014
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.398
Teacher spread0.358 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRomani and Gypsy StudiesFrench-language works237,207