Characterization of Near Infrared-Dye Colored Fabrics Using Hyperspectral Imaging
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Near-infrared (NIR) dyes have a unique ability to interact favorably with light in the NIR region, which is particularly interesting where stealth and camouflage are paramount, such as in military uniforms. Characterization of cotton fabric dyed with NIR-absorbing dyes using visible-NIR (Vis-NIR) and short-wave infrared (SWIR) hyperspectral imaging was done. The aim of the study was to discern spectral changes caused by variations in dye concentration and dyeing temperature as these parameters directly influence color- and crocking-fastness of fabrics impacting the camouflage effect. The fabric was dyed at three concentrations (2.5, 5, and 10%) and two dyeing temperatures (55 °C and 85 °C) and principal component analysis (PCA) and partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) were performed on the spectra to discriminate the fabrics based on dye concentrations. The PCA models successfully segregated the fabrics based on the dye concentration and dyeing temperature, while PLS-DA models demonstrated classification accuracies between 75 and 100% in the Vis-NIR range. Spectra in the SWIR region could not be used to detect the differences in the concentrations of the NIR dyes. This finding is promising, as it aligns with the objective of creating NIR-dyed camouflage fabrics that remain indistinguishable under varying dye concentrations. These results open possibilities for further exploration in enhancing the stealth capabilities of textiles in military applications.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".