The retromer and retriever systems are conserved and differentially expanded in parabasalids
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Early endosomes sort transmembrane cargo either for lysosomal degradation or retrieval to the plasma membrane or the Golgi complex. Endosomal retrieval in eukaryotes is governed by the anciently homologous retromer or retriever complexes. Each comprises a core tri-protein subcomplex, membrane-deformation proteins and interacting partner complexes, together retrieving a variety of known cargo proteins. Trichomonas vaginalis, a sexually transmitted human parasite, uses the endomembrane system for pathogenesis. It has massively and selectively expanded its endomembrane protein complement, the evolutionary path of which has been largely unexplored. Our molecular evolutionary study of retromer, retriever and associated machinery in parabasalids and its free-living sister lineage of Anaeramoeba demonstrates specific expansion of the retromer machinery, contrasting with the retriever components. We also observed partial loss of the Commander complex and sorting nexins in Parabasalia but complete retention in Anaeramoeba. Notably, we identified putative parabasalid sorting nexin analogs. Finally, we report the first retriever protein localization in a non-metazoan group along with retromer protein localization in T. vaginalis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".