A Closest Point Method for PDEs on Manifolds with Interior Boundary Conditions for Geometry Processing
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Many geometry processing techniques require the solution of partial differential equations (PDEs) on manifolds embedded in ℝ 2 or ℝ 3 , such as curves or surfaces. Such manifold PDEs often involve boundary conditions (e.g., Dirichlet or Neumann) prescribed at points or curves on the manifold’s interior or along the geometric (exterior) boundary of an open manifold. However, input manifolds can take many forms (e.g., triangle meshes, parametrizations, point clouds, implicit functions, etc.). Typically, one must generate a mesh to apply finite element-type techniques or derive specialized discretization procedures for each distinct manifold representation. We propose instead to address such problems in a unified manner through a novel extension of the closest point method (CPM) to handle interior boundary conditions. CPM solves the manifold PDE by solving a volumetric PDE defined over the Cartesian embedding space containing the manifold and requires only a closest point representation of the manifold. Hence, CPM supports objects that are open or closed, orientable or not, and of any codimension. To enable support for interior boundary conditions, we derive a method that implicitly partitions the embedding space across interior boundaries. CPM’s finite difference and interpolation stencils are adapted to respect this partition while preserving second-order accuracy. Additionally, we develop an efficient sparse-grid implementation and numerical solver that can scale to tens of millions of degrees of freedom, allowing PDEs to be solved on more complex manifolds. We demonstrate our method’s convergence behavior on selected model PDEs and explore several geometry processing problems: diffusion curves on surfaces, geodesic distance, tangent vector field design, harmonic map construction, and reaction-diffusion textures. Our proposed approach thus offers a powerful and flexible new tool for a range of geometry processing tasks on general manifold representations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".