Enhancing Sustainability in Hopedale, Newfoundland and Labrador, Through Hybrid Microgrid System Design
Bibliographic record
Abstract
An evaluation of renewable energy system (RES) adoption in Hopedale, Newfoundland and Labrador, was conducted with the focus on developing a robust hybrid microgrid system. Situated in a remote area distinguished by its severe weather and rich cultural history, Hopedale primarily relies on diesel generators for energy, presenting unique challenges including high energy costs and significant environmental impacts. The current reliance on three diesel generators for electrical needs underscores the necessity for a shift towards sustainable energy. Hybrid Optimization of Multiple Energy Resources (HOMER) Pro simulations were employed in this study to analyze a proposed system integrating solar and wind power, battery storage, and an additional diesel generator. The system's design aims to reduce dependency on fossil fuels amidst increasing environmental concerns and fossil fuel limitations. The environmental performance and cost-effectiveness of combining solar and wind energy with battery storage and a diesel backup were assessed. The hybrid system's potential to decrease carbon emissions by over 50% compared to the existing diesel-only setup is demonstrated, suggesting a substantial reduction in greenhouse gas emissions. Although the economic Levelized Cost of Energy (LCOE) of \$0.182 per kWh is higher than the traditional diesel cost of $0.16 per kWh, it represents a strategic commitment to environmental sustainability. A Net Present Cost (NPC) of \$14.6 million was predicted for the system, encompassing Capital Expenditure (CAPEX), Operational Expenditure (OPEX), and replacement cost over 25 years. Significant reductions in environmental impact and notable operational savings were anticipated. These findings contribute valuable insights into the benefits of hybrid microgrids for remote communities, offering a model for energy resilience, cost savings, and reduced carbon footprints. Thus, the study adds significant information to the ongoing discourse on sustainable energy solutions for isolated locations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".