Ligwiłda’xw Expansion into Northern Coast Salish Lands in the Nineteenth Century
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Also spelled Liqwiltokw' (in reference to the people) or Liq'wala (in reference to the language).2 Because of internal conflicts within the Kwakwaka'wakw community, the Potlatch Collection was divided between two local museums, the Kwagiulth Museum and the U'Mista Cultural Centre.Located in Alert Bay, the latter opened in November 1980. Lig ̱ wiłda'x̱ w Expansion into Northern Coast Salish Lands in the Nineteenth CenturyMarie Mauzé This chapter is based on research I undertook 40 years ago, when I started fieldwork in the Lig ̱ wiłda'x̱ w 1 community (part of the Kwakwa̱ ka̱ 'wakw community) of Cape Mudge, on Quadra Island, British Columbia.Since then, I have kept an ongoing relationship with several Lig ̱ wiłda'x̱ w families I visit on a regular basis.About six months before my arrival in Cape Mudge in January 1980, a great event had taken place in the village with the opening of the Kwagiulth Museum (now the Nuyumbalees Cultural Centre) in June 1979.The museum was built to house part of the Potlatch Collection confiscated by the Canadian Government in 1922 following the illegal organisation of a potlatch, an institution banned since 1884. 2In the context of the repatriation of confiscated ceremonial regalia by the then National Museum in Ottawa and the re-appropriation of their cultural heritage in the 1980s and 1990s, elders and Native consultants' interests led me to undertake research on the history of the Lig ̱ wiłda'x̱ w.Several of the elders and consultants were aware that their group had been kept on the margins of ethnographic attention when compared to other Kwakwa̱ ka̱ 'wakw communities.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".